1995 BMW CLS vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | CLS | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |
