1995 BMW CLS vs. 2002 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2002 Eagle Vision is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2002 Eagle Vision. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2002 Eagle Vision.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2002 Eagle Vision | |
| Make | BMW | Eagle |
| Model | CLS | Vision |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
