1995 BMW CLS vs. 2002 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 Jaguar XK8. (300 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2002 Jaguar XK8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XK8 (420 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2002 Jaguar XK8 has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XK8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2002 Jaguar XK8 | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | CLS | XK8 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2590 mm |
