1995 BMW CLS vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP) has 280 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | BMW | MCC |
| Model | CLS | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1810 mm |
