1995 BMW CLS vs. 2004 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2004 Cadillac SRX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac SRX. (255 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac SRX.
Because 2004 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac SRX (342 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2004 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | CLS | SRX |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 342 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2960 mm |