1995 BMW CLS vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2004 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2004 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden UTE (305 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | CLS | UTE |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |