1995 BMW CLS vs. 2004 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2004 Honda CR-V is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Because 2004 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2004 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | CLS | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |
