1995 BMW CLS vs. 2005 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Astro. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2005 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | CLS | Astro |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2830 mm |