1995 BMW CLS vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (286 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | CLS | Equinox |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 286 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2810 mm |