1995 BMW CLS vs. 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager

To start off, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (150 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager.

Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (218 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager. 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: