1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (542 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Chevrolet SSR | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | CLS | SSR |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 401 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |
