1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe. (284 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe (427 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | CLS | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2070 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1970 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |