1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP) has 178 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | CLS | Grand Voyager |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 172 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3040 mm |
