1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | CLS | Charger |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 6063 cc |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3050 mm |