1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2006 Honda CR-V. (156 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Honda CR-V.
Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Honda CR-V. (217 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Honda CR-V. 2006 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | CLS | CR-V |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |