1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | CLS | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |