1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2006 Volvo XC90. (235 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo XC90.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (321 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2006 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | CLS | XC90 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2870 mm |