1995 BMW CLS vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 4,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2006 Volvo XC90. (312 HP @ 5850 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo XC90.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (441 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2006 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | CLS | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 312 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5850 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2870 mm |
