1995 BMW CLS vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2008 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | CLS | CTS |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2890 mm |