1995 BMW CLS vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | CLS | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |