1995 BMW CLS vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | CLS | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1995 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 321 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |