1995 BMW CLS vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (307 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | CLS | CTS |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 307 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 374 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2890 mm |