1995 BMW CLS vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Compass (310 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | CLS | Compass |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2640 mm |
