1995 BMW CLS vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2009 Mazda Tribute. (240 HP @ 6550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda Tribute.

Because 2009 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda Tribute (302 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2009 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: