1995 BMW CLS vs. 2009 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Sable. (263 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Sable.

Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercury Sable (338 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2009 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: