1995 BMW CLS vs. 2010 Aston Martin DBS
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin DBS (569 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2010 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2010 Aston Martin DBS | |
| Make | BMW | Aston Martin |
| Model | CLS | DBS |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2741 mm |
