1995 BMW CLS vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | CLS | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 426 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2852 mm |
