1995 BMW CLS vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Ram. (345 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (510 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2010 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | CLS | Ram |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 4080 mm |
