1995 BMW CLS vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP) has 196 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | CLS | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 380 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |