1995 BMW CLS vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2012 Nissan NV. (317 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan NV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (521 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2012 Nissan NV has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan NV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2012 Nissan NV | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | CLS | NV |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 521 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2156 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3711 mm |
