1995 BMW CLS vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | CLS | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 536 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3052 mm |