1995 BMW CLS vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1995 BMW CLS. (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (681 Nm) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | CLS | XK |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 681 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2032 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1322 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2752 mm |
