1995 BMW Dinan vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Dinan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Dinan would be higher. At 5,598 cc (12 cylinders), 1995 BMW Dinan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW Dinan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (976 Nm) has 832 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda CR-V. (144 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW Dinan | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | Dinan | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5598 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 976 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 172 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2630 mm |
