1995 BMW Dinan vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Dinan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Dinan would be higher. At 4,807 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Dinan (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. (260 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Dinan should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 537 kg more than 1995 BMW Dinan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (403 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe. (393 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Dinan | 2003 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Dinan | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 4807 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 403 Nm | 393 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 2262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2950 mm |