1995 BMW Dinan vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Dinan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Dinan would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW Dinan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Dinan (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Dinan should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1995 BMW Dinan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW Dinan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (403 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (108 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Dinan | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | Dinan | Citi |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 403 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |