1995 BMW Dinan vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Dinan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Dinan would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Dinan (326 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (271 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Dinan should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW Dinan. (403 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW Dinan. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW Dinan has manual transmission. 1995 BMW Dinan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Dinan | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | Dinan | XF |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 403 Nm | 600 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2908 mm |