1995 BMW Dinan vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Dinan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Dinan would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Dinan (326 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (281 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Dinan should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (403 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (350 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Dinan | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Dinan | UTE |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 403 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |