1995 BMW Dinan vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Dinan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Dinan would be higher. At 5,598 cc (12 cylinders), 1995 BMW Dinan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW Dinan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (976 Nm) has 752 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW Dinan | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | Dinan | Compass |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5598 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 976 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2634 mm |
