1995 BMW Just 4 vs. 1963 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1995 BMW Just 4 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Just 4 (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Just 4 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Because 1995 BMW Just 4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 BMW Just 4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Just 4 (260 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Just 4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW Just 4 | 1963 Jaguar MK II | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | Just 4 | MK II |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1097 cc | 2482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2900 mm |
