1995 BMW Just 4 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW Just 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW Just 4 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (160 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1995 BMW Just 4. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW Just 4.
Because 1995 BMW Just 4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 BMW Just 4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Just 4 (260 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (176 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Just 4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7. 1995 BMW Just 4 has automatic transmission and 2003 Caterham 7 has manual transmission. 2003 Caterham 7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 BMW Just 4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Just 4 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | BMW | Caterham |
Model | Just 4 | 7 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2230 mm |