1995 BMW M3 vs. 1996 Daewoo Nexia
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 1995 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 1995 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. 1996 Daewoo Nexia has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1995 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Daewoo Nexia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW M3 | 1996 Daewoo Nexia | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | M3 | Nexia |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |