1995 BMW M3 vs. 1998 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1998 Honda CR-V is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW M3 (282 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1998 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda CR-V weights approximately 35 kg more than 1995 BMW M3.
Because 1998 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 1995 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW M3 | 1998 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | M3 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1995 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.8 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |