1995 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1995 BMW M3. (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 335 kg more than 1995 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 523 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW M3. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW M3 | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | M3 | XKA |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2988 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2590 mm |
