1995 BMW M3 vs. 2001 BMW M
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (325 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1995 BMW M3. (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW M3 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M (350 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW M3. (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2001 BMW M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW M3 | 2001 BMW M | |
Make | BMW | BMW |
Model | M3 | M |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 51 L |