1995 BMW M3 vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2004 GMC Canyon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW M3 (282 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 260 kg more than 1995 BMW M3.
Because 2004 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 1995 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW M3 | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M3 | Canyon |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 74 L |