1995 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW M3 weights approximately 253 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (137 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW M3 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 1758 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1212 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |