1995 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2009 Volvo S40. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo S40.
Because 1995 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1995 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40. 2009 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1995 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW M3 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M3 | S40 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2988 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |