1995 BMW S3 vs. 2002 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2002 SsangYong Musso is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW S3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW S3 would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW S3 (338 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2002 SsangYong Musso. (217 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW S3 should accelerate faster than 2002 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 181 kg more than 1995 BMW S3.
Because 2002 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW S3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Musso (305 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW S3. (260 Nm). This means 2002 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW S3. 2002 SsangYong Musso has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW S3 has manual transmission. 1995 BMW S3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 SsangYong Musso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW S3 | 2002 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | BMW | SsangYong |
Model | S3 | Musso |
Year Released | 1995 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2640 mm |