1995 BMW S3 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW S3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW S3 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW S3 (338 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW S3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1995 BMW S3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW S3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW S3 (260 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm). This means 1995 BMW S3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW S3 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | S3 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2601 mm |