1995 BMW Z3 vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 1995 BMW Z3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW Z3 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1995 BMW Z3.
Because 1995 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 179 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW Z3 | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | Z3 | 600 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2630 mm |